Tuesday, August 23, 2005

Thou Shalt Not

The Christian faith is full of wisdom for one who has the patience to listen to its teachings. Said the Christ:
"If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners do that. And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, expecting to be repaid in full. But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful."

The clear, peaceful teachings of the Christ make the warmongering cries of those that raise his banner even harder to stomach. Mr. Pat Robertson, how can you say you are the spokesman of Christ? How does your speech follow his teachings? How can you stand in front of admiring crowds and read to them the words of Jesus above, when you advocate the execution of Hugo Chavez, saying:
"If he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it...It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war. And I don't think any oil shipments will stop."

2 Comments:

At 3:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Men is full of hypocrisy, we need God's kingdom.

 
At 10:33 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

Hello fellow Buddhists, libertarians, et al,

I hope it isn't bad netiquette for me to do this, but I'm writing a self-introductory post to the "Buddhist libertarian" blogs, forums, etc. that I've discovered through Google searches or just stumbled upon while on-line.

I'm an American of European descent, born and raised Catholic, and have been a Theravada Buddhist with "orthodox" leanings for 31 years:

http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1594

I have been a libertarian for almost as long, first voting for Ed Clark in the 1980 presidential election. I joined the Libertarian Party in 1988, but after 19 years of membership, became disillusioned with it, and left a few years ago.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertarian-outreach/message/124

I was a minarchist but have "conversed" with anarchists for many years. I now question how relevant or meaningful the anarchy-minarchy issue really is, and consider myself "neutral" with respect to it.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LeftLibertarian2/message/26665

I have described my libertarianism as ideological and liberal, but I hesitate to identify with "left" libertarianism, due to doubts about some of it's tenets and leanings:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LeftLibertarian2/message/19196

I think of my libertarianism as a "larger libertarianism", that can include voluntary socialism, collective self-help and other mutually agreed on economic arrangements other than profit-based business. I like Philip Jacobsons "Three Voluntary Economies":

http://libertariannation.org/a/f24j1.html

I believe there are many affinities between Buddhism and libertarianism in both their many forms and I think those affinities hold a rich and potentially fruitful field of exploration.

I hope more "engaged" Buddhists can be persuaded of the negative ramifications of "coercive (state) altruism", and the benefits of exploring and implementing non or minimally violent/governmental ways of alleviating suffering in this world.

I hope to visit each of your sites individually, and join your conversation when I can.

Thank you,
James N. Dawson

 

Post a Comment

<< Home